
Being accused of shoplifting or Theft Under $5,000 can be stressful, confusing, and overwhelming. Many people charged with shoplifting have never been in trouble before and have no idea how the criminal justice system works. A simple misunderstanding at a store, a self-checkout mistake, or an error in judgment can suddenly put your future at risk.
With over a decade of experience defending theft and property-related offences in Brampton, I provide strategic guidance from day one. My goal is to protect your record, challenge weak evidence, and secure the best resolution possible — often without a criminal conviction.
Call (437) 998-1429 for immediate assistance.
Shoplifting is generally prosecuted as Theft Under $5,000, a criminal offence under section 334(b) of the Criminal Code. Although often viewed as a “minor” offence, the consequences can be major if the charge is mishandled.
Shoplifting allegations arise in a variety of ways, including:
Large retail chains like Walmart, Shoppers Drug Mart, Winners, Canadian Tire, and major grocery stores frequently rely on loss prevention officers and surveillance cameras. However, these systems are not perfect, and wrongful accusations happen far more often than people realize.
Loss prevention officers typically:
I carefully review whether store security acted lawfully and whether their procedures violated your rights.

Many people charged with shoplifting are first-time offenders with no criminal history. In such cases, there are often strong opportunities to avoid a conviction.

I negotiate firmly with the Crown to secure an outcome that protects your record and prevents long-term consequences.
The penalties for a shoplifting conviction depend on the circumstances, your history, and the amount involved. Even if the dollar value is low, the repercussions can extend far beyond the courtroom.
Potential outcomes include:

Every shoplifting case is different, and I tailor my defence strategy based on the evidence, your background, and the manner in which the investigation unfolded. My goal is always to secure a withdrawal, diversion, or a resolution that protects your record.

My defence approach is proactive. I gather information early, carefully examine all disclosures, and negotiate from a position of strength.
Your decisions immediately after an alleged shoplifting incident can strongly affect your case.

The Crown’s position is heavily influenced by:
Early intervention often leads to better outcomes and avoids preventable mistakes.
After an alleged shoplifting incident, many retailers hire third-party collection companies to send “civil recovery” or “civil demand” letters. These letters claim you owe the store hundreds of dollars in “loss prevention costs,” even if nothing was actually stolen.
Before responding to anything, speak with me so I can advise you on the safest approach.
When you hire me, you receive direct, one-on-one legal representation. I do not pass your file to juniors or assistants. I personally analyze your evidence, handle your court appearances, and negotiate with the Crown.
My focus is on resolving your case with the best possible outcome.

Selecting the right lawyer can make the difference between walking away with a clean record and facing long-term consequences.
My priority is protecting your future, not just closing your file.
If you’re facing a shoplifting or Theft Under $5,000 allegation in Brampton, I can help protect your rights and guide you toward the most favourable outcome. Early legal advice is critical — do not navigate this alone.
Call me at (437) 998-1429 for a confidential, no-obligation consultation.
Yes. Shoplifting is charged as Theft Under $5,000, which is a criminal offence that can carry long-term consequences if not resolved properly.
Yes. If the evidence is weak, intent is unclear, or you complete diversion requirements, the Crown may withdraw the charge.
You are not legally obligated to pay. These letters are unrelated to the criminal case. Speak with me before doing anything.
Travel is usually permitted, but a conviction may create issues. Always get legal advice if immigration or border crossing is a concern.
Not necessarily. Many cases — especially first-time offences — can be resolved through diversion, discharges, or withdrawals. With proper defence, a record can often be avoided.
Self-checkout errors are common and, in and of themselves, do not prove intent. Lack of intent is a strong defence in many cases.
Youth are dealt with under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, which focuses heavily on rehabilitation and record protection.