
Break and enter is a serious criminal offence under the Criminal Code of Canada. It is often prosecuted aggressively due to its connection with property offences, theft allegations, and the potential risk to occupants. The Crown must prove both an unlawful entry and an intention to commit an indictable offence inside the premises.
As a Break and Enter Lawyer in Brampton with more than 10 years of experience defending property-related offences across Ontario, I provide strategic, evidence-driven defence representation to protect your rights and secure the best possible outcome.
Request a confidential consultation or call me directly at (437) 998-1429 to discuss your case.
Break and enter does not require physical force. Even opening an unlocked door or window can constitute a “break” in law. The offence can apply to:
These charges are often laid alongside or instead of break and enter:
Understanding the legal framework is crucial, as the type of property involved and the Crown’s allegations can significantly impact your exposure to penalties.

Break and enter carries some of the harshest penalties among property crimes in Canada. When the offence involves a dwelling-house, the maximum punishment is life imprisonment.

Potential Outcomes You Could Face
The sentencing depends on factors such as whether the building was occupied, whether violence was alleged, whether theft occurred, and whether you have a prior criminal record.
Break-and-enter cases often arise from misunderstandings or misinterpretations. I regularly defend clients in situations involving:
These situations often require a strong factual defence to challenge the Crown’s assumptions and protect your credibility.
Effective defence work begins with understanding the evidence and challenging the Crown’s theory. My approach is tailored to the specific allegations, focusing on the weaknesses that can lead to reduced charges, withdrawals, or acquittals.
Video, eyewitness observations, and forensic evidence are often unreliable or incomplete. I scrutinize every detail to undermine faulty or speculative identification.

The Crown must prove intent to commit an indictable offence inside the premises. I often challenge the assumption that you intended theft, assault, or any offence.
If police obtained evidence through Charter violations, I may seek to have that evidence excluded from trial.
Fingerprints, DNA, and surveillance footage are not always definitive. I review expert reports for inconsistencies and weaknesses.
In many cases, there was permission or a reasonable belief of permission to enter the property.
For first-time offenders, youth clients, or lower-risk allegations, non-criminal resolutions may be possible.
I defend every case personally, ensuring you receive focused, experienced, and individualized representation.
More than 10 years of experience handling property offences in Brampton and across Ontario
Break and enter allegations can be complex, but you do not have to face them alone.
Your actions in the early stages can significantly affect the defence strategy.
Speaking with me early allows me to protect your rights and prevent avoidable mistakes.

I approach every break-and-enter charge with a clear, step-by-step defence plan.

Full review of the allegations and your version of events
I represent individuals facing all forms of break and enter and related property offences, including:
If you have been charged with break and enter, early legal advice can make a significant difference in your case. I provide clear guidance, strong defence strategies, and focused representation designed to protect your future.
Contact me today for a confidential consultation.
Call (437) 998-1429 or request a case review to get started.
Yes. The offence focuses on unlawful entry and intent, not whether anything was taken.
Not always. Sentencing depends on the circumstances, the property involved, and your background.
Yes. Weak evidence, lack of intent, Charter issues, or strong defence negotiation can lead to withdrawals.
Lawful entry or reasonable belief of permission is a strong defence and may lead to the charge being withdrawn.
Misidentification is common in property crime cases. I analyze all identification evidence and challenge unreliable observations.
Home invasion requires additional aggravating factors, such as threats or violence during the entry.
Timelines vary, but most cases range from several months to a year, depending on the complexity of the evidence.
Youth cases usually proceed under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, which emphasizes rehabilitation.