
Facing an allegation that you used a firearm during another offence is one of the most serious situations in criminal law. Mandatory jail, aggressive prosecution, and long-term consequences all come into play the moment this charge is laid.
With over 10 years of defending firearm-related offences in Brampton, I know exactly how quickly these cases escalate and how critical early legal intervention is.
If you've been charged or believe you're under investigation, call me immediately for a confidential consultation.
When the police accuse you of using a firearm in the commission of an offence, they are charging you under section 85 of the Criminal Code—a provision designed to increase penalties when a gun is present during another crime. This isn't a standalone charge. It is an "add-on offence" that sits on top of whatever the Crown says you were doing at the time, whether that's robbery, assault, break, or drug trafficking.
Many people assume the gun must be fired. It doesn't. Under Canadian law, "use" includes:
Because the definition is broad, police often lay this charge even when the evidence is weak or based entirely on assumptions, witness descriptions, or proximity to a firearm.


A conviction under s. 85 almost always brings a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment, even if:
That simple structure is what makes this charge so dangerous.
This charge brings some of the toughest sentencing rules in Canadian criminal law, including mandatory imprisonment.
A conviction for using a firearm in the commission of an offence triggers mandatory minimum jail sentences under the Criminal Code. These penalties apply even when:
The sentence increases if the Crown alleges the Firearm was loaded, operational, brandished, or used to threaten. When combined with the underlying offence—such as robbery, assault, or drug trafficking—the total exposure can be significant.
In Brampton courts, prosecutors often highlight factors such as:
These aggravating elements can dramatically increase sentencing positions.

A conviction has effects far beyond the courtroom. You may face:
This charge carries weight long after the sentence is served, which is why early defence planning is essential.
When Police Believe a Firearm Was Used to Support Another Crime. Most clients are surprised by how quickly this charge is added to a file. In Peel Region, I frequently see s. 85 charges laid in scenarios such as:
These situations show how broad and aggressive the application of this charge can be—and why early defence work is crucial.

When you're facing a charge that carries mandatory jail, you need a lawyer who understands how these cases are built and how to break them apart. I've spent over 10 years defending firearm-related offences in Brampton, and I know how Peel police investigate, how local Crown prosecutors prosecute, and which arguments actually succeed in this courthouse.
You work directly with me—no junior lawyers, no delegation. I handle every stage myself, from the first call to trial strategy, ensuring your defence is consistent, precise, and tailored to the evidence.
Experience matters most when the consequences are this serious.

I focus on the specific weaknesses in the Crown's case. My defence work typically includes:
Charges involving the use of a firearm in the commission of an offence carry serious potential penalties under the Criminal Code. Defending these cases often requires careful review of the evidence, including the circumstances of the alleged offence, the classification of the firearm, and the applicability of mandatory sentencing provisions.
When you're accused of using a firearm during another offence, every decision you make after the arrest can affect the outcome. Here are the steps you need to take immediately:
A strong defence begins the moment you reach out.
If you're facing an allegation that you used a firearm during another offence, you cannot afford delays or mistakes. The consequences are life-altering, and early defence work makes all the difference.
Call me now for a confidential consultation:
(437) 998-1429
I'll speak with you directly, review your situation, and start protecting your future immediately.

Yes. A conviction under s. 85 almost always carries a mandatory jail sentence. Avoiding that minimum is a core focus of the defence.
Police may still lay the charge before confirming operability. I challenge the forensic testing and the legal qualification of the object as a firearm.
Most firearm cases take several months, depending on disclosure, Charter issues, and whether the matter proceeds to trial.
No. "Use" includes displaying, pointing, producing, or having a firearm accessible during the alleged offence.
Yes, but bail hearings are more complex because firearm allegations trigger stricter scrutiny. Early preparation is critical.
In many cases, yes. Success depends on the evidence, Charter issues, identification problems, and whether the Crown can prove both the underlying offence and firearm "use."